Thursday, April 27, 2023

Cetirizine

Cetirizine





You may have heard about cetirizine and maybe even use it when you have some allergies as it is an anti-histaminic agent well known for years. It is a second-generation histamine antagonist with a higher affinity for histamine H1 receptors; but, what’s its role in immunotherapy?

Research done in The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center found that treatment with antihistamines was associated with improved responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) therapy. They found that histamine receptor H1 (HRH1) are highly expressed not in cancer cells but in certain types of tumor-associated macrophages that contribute to immune suppression; HRH1 acts in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress T cell activation in the tumor microenvironment. So, blocking HRH1 on macrophages decreased the immune-suppressive activity of the macrophages leading to an increased T cell activation and inhibition of tumor growth. This study suggests that the histamine HRH1 axis could serve as a potential biomarker of T cell dysfunction and immunotherapy response as well as promising therapeutic targets for enhancing immunotherapy response; implying that patients who have high levels of histamine in plasma that respond poorly to immunotherapies may particularly benefit from antihistamine treatment.

So by the evidence, targeting HRH1 may be useful in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance and improve the outcomes.
There’s left to be done more studies that show or prove the efficacy of combining more antihistamine drugs with more immune checkpoint inhibitors for it to be a standard treatment and to have the best results when using immunotherapy for cancer treatment.

https://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/fulltext/S1535-6108(21)00602-4



The post Cetirizine appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/cetirizine/

Tuesday, April 25, 2023

IMMUNOTHERAPY IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN CANCER PATIENTS

IMMUNOTHERAPY IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN CANCER PATIENTS





Immunotherapy is a highly successful treatment in the fight against cancer, thanks to the excellent drugs used for this purpose. These drugs unlock the immune system so the body can fight against this disease. That is why cancer is among the leading causes of death worldwide, and immunotherapy has been a great contribution to its fight, as it helps the immune system fight cancer cells.

The immune system is composed of white blood cells, antibodies, the complement system, the lymphatic system, the spleen, the thymus, and the bone marrow, and it detects and destroys abnormal cells that infiltrate the body. It works by preventing or slowing down the growth of many types of cancer, but cancer cells can sometimes overcome their defenses. In those cases, immunotherapy treatments can help work the immune system to fight cancer cells found in the body.

It is important to mention that not all cancer patients are candidates for immunotherapy, as it often depends on the type of cancer and how advanced it is at the time the treatment is requested. Additionally, the use of immunotherapy also depends on whether current cancer treatment guidelines and data support immunotherapy as a cancer treatment. Generally, ideal candidates are those who have advanced cancer and have exhausted other conventional treatment options.

Immunotherapy has some advantages, such as having fewer immediate and long-term side effects. Other therapies are related to heart problems, surgical complications, and issues with hormones and memory. In addition, patients have a high chance of continuing immunotherapy treatments for longer periods without sacrificing their quality of life.

Currently, several types of cancer, such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, have been approved for this treatment. Other cancers approved for immunotherapy treatments include liver cancer, stomach cancer, cervical cancer, bladder cancer, some breast cancers, and lymphoma. Therefore, immunotherapy remains one of the most effective treatments in the fight against cancer.

Reference

Soteras, A. (2022). Inmunoterapia contra el cáncer y mejora de la

supervivencia, una realidad. EFE Salud. https://efesalud.com/inmunoterapia-y-mejora-de-la-supervivencia-una-realidad/



The post IMMUNOTHERAPY IMPROVES SURVIVAL IN CANCER PATIENTS appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/immunotherapy-improves-survival-in-cancer-patients/

Monday, April 24, 2023

Cryoablation Plus Intratumoral Immunotherapy of Breast Cancer: A Promising Treatment Approach

Cryoablation Plus Intratumoral Immunotherapy of Breast Cancer: A Promising Treatment Approach





Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer among women worldwide, and although great progress has been made in the treatment of this disease, there is still a need for more effective and less invasive therapies. Cryoablation and immunotherapy are two innovative approaches that have shown promising results in the treatment of breast cancer, and when combined, they may provide a powerful new weapon against this disease.

Cryoablation is a minimally invasive technique that uses extreme cold to destroy cancerous tumors. During this procedure, a thin probe is inserted into the tumor, and liquid nitrogen is used to freeze and destroy the tumor cells. Cryoablation has been used successfully to treat small breast tumors, and it has several advantages over traditional surgery, such as less pain, faster recovery, and a lower risk of complications.

Immunotherapy, on the other hand, is a treatment approach that uses the patient’s own immune system to fight cancer. This technique involves the injection of drugs directly into the tumor, which stimulates the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. Intratumoral immunotherapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of several types of cancer, including breast cancer.

Recent studies have shown that the combination of cryoablation and intratumoral immunotherapy may be a highly effective treatment approach for breast cancer. In one study, researchers treated a group of women with small breast tumors with cryoablation and intratumoral immunotherapy. The results were impressive: the tumors were completely eliminated in 100% of the patients, and there were no recurrences during the follow-up period.

This combination therapy works by destroying the tumor cells with cryoablation, which releases antigens that stimulate the immune system to attack the cancer cells. The immunotherapy then helps to amplify the immune response, which further enhances the destruction of the cancer cells. This approach has the potential to not only eliminate the primary tumor but also to prevent the spread of cancer to other parts of the body.

In conclusion, cryoablation plus intratumoral immunotherapy is a promising treatment approach for breast cancer that has shown impressive results in recent studies. This combination therapy has several advantages over traditional surgery and chemotherapy, and it may provide a less invasive and more effective treatment option for women with small breast tumors. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness of this approach, but it holds great promise for the future of breast cancer treatment.



The post Cryoablation Plus Intratumoral Immunotherapy of Breast Cancer: A Promising Treatment Approach appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/cryoablation-plus-intratumoral-immunotherapy-of-breast-cancer-a-promising-treatment-approach/

Friday, April 21, 2023

Selenium in Cancer Treatment

Selenium in Cancer Treatment





Selenium was first discovered in 1817 by Jöns Jacob Berzelius, it’s named after “Selene” the Greek Goddess of the moon. Selenium is found in a few rare minerals. It is an essential trace element for some species, including humans. Our bodies contain about 14 milligrams, and every cell in a human body contains more than a million selenium atoms. Selenium has been shown to have an immune-boosting and immune suppressing effect. It’s boosting effects are due to it’s involvement in enhancing activation and proliferation of B cells and/or it’s ability to promote immune cell differentiation; in a study conducted by Hoffman et al. demonstrated that supplementing this element in mice promoted T cell receptor signaling that pushed T cell differentiation toward Th1 by increasing interlukin -2 and interferon gamma production; another study in human subjects showed that selenium supplementation resulted in substantially higher levels of both Th1 and Th2 and, also increased plasma selenium levels. In cancer, selenium down-regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (produced by cancer cells as response to hypoxia that promotes angiogenesis to deliver nutrients and oxygen to the growing tumor) leading to the downregulation in expression of several genes involved in angiogenesis such as VEGF. Selenium also helps with DNA repair in response to DNA-damaging agents improving the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents and protecting normal cells from their toxicity. Also, it was shown to reduce drug detoxification and increase cytotoxic effects of anti-cancer drugs in cancer cells and increasing detoxification and reducing cytotoxic effects in normal tissues by maintaining redox homeostasis.



The post Selenium in Cancer Treatment appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/selenium-in-cancer-treatment/

Thursday, April 20, 2023

Intratumoral immunotherapy with Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF)

Intratumoral immunotherapy with Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF)





Intratumoral immunotherapy with Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF) is an emerging approach to cancer treatment that combines the benefits of immunotherapy and PEF technology. This technique involves the local administration of immunotherapeutic agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors or cytokines, into a tumor followed by the application of PEF to enhance their effectiveness PEF technology can increase the uptake and activation of immunotherapeutic agents by tumor cells, leading to a stronger immune response against cancer. PEF also has a direct cytotoxic effect on cancer cells, which can further enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy.

Intratumoral immunotherapy with PEF has shown promising results in preclinical studies and early clinical trials, particularly in the treatment of solid tumors. This approach has the potential to overcome the limitations of systemic immunotherapy, such as poor tumor penetration and off-target effects, by delivering the treatment directly to the tumor site.

Overall, intratumoral immunotherapy with PEF represents a novel and promising approach
to cancer treatment that warrants further investigation in clinical trials.


The post Intratumoral immunotherapy with Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF) appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/intratumoral-immunotherapy-with-pulsed-electrical-field-pef/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=intratumoral-immunotherapy-with-pulsed-electrical-field-pef

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy

Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy





A new article published in Science Immunology on February 17, 2023, discussed the immune reprogramming of neutrophils in a breast cancer metastasis model.  The article was written by Gong et al., link below.  What makes this finding and paper so important?  As I have mentioned in my book, the immune system has two sides, one that will attack cancer and the other that will protect it.  One critical area that gets less attention than T cells is myeloid cells, part of the innate immune response.  Specifically, in this case, we are discussing neutrophils.  This article discusses that the PGE2-EP2/EP4 pathway is involved in the recruitment and maintenance of cancer-protecting neutrophils in the lung for breast cancer metastasis.  Blocking this pathway at the end of EP2/EP4 can reduce these neutrophils and sensitive cancer to the immune system.  As we have discussed, NSAIDs such as Ibuprofen, Asprin, and Celebrex inhibit PGE2.  However, in this study, Celebrex did not sufficiently block the pathway to affect the neutrophils.
More specific EP2/EP4 inhibition is needed.  They also discuss a partial role in blocking IL-1 and IL-6, both upstream regulators.  This is an area that we have experience with using anakinra and tocilizumab, also mentioned in my book.  As far as an NSAID that blocks, more specifically, EP2/EP4, there are several studies, including one approved for arthritis in dogs about seven years ago.  This is certainly an area that needs more investigation, but the addition of EP2/Ep4 inhibitors to immunotherapy may show some benefit.
Jason R. Williams, MD, DABR
Director of Interventional Oncology/Immunotherapy
Williams Cancer Institute


The post Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/reprogramming-neutrophils-to-enhance-cancer-immunotherapy-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=reprogramming-neutrophils-to-enhance-cancer-immunotherapy-2

Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy

Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy





A new article published in Science Immunology on February 17, 2023, discussed the immune reprogramming of neutrophils in a breast cancer metastasis model.  The article was written by Gong et al., link below.  What makes this finding and paper so important?  As I have mentioned in my book, the immune system has two sides, one that will attack cancer and the other that will protect it.  One critical area that gets less attention than T cells is myeloid cells, part of the innate immune response.  Specifically, in this case, we are discussing neutrophils.  This article discusses that the PGE2-EP2/EP4 pathway is involved in the recruitment and maintenance of cancer-protecting neutrophils in the lung for breast cancer metastasis.  Blocking this pathway at the end of EP2/EP4 can reduce these neutrophils and sensitive cancer to the immune system.  As we have discussed, NSAIDs such as Ibuprofen, Asprin, and Celebrex inhibit PGE2.  However, in this study, Celebrex did not sufficiently block the pathway to affect the neutrophils.
More specific EP2/EP4 inhibition is needed.  They also discuss a partial role in blocking IL-1 and IL-6, both upstream regulators.  This is an area that we have experience with using anakinra and tocilizumab, also mentioned in my book.  As far as an NSAID that blocks, more specifically, EP2/EP4, there are several studies, including one approved for arthritis in dogs about seven years ago.  This is certainly an area that needs more investigation, but the addition of EP2/Ep4 inhibitors to immunotherapy may show some benefit.
Jason R. Williams, MD, DABR
Director of Interventional Oncology/Immunotherapy
Williams Cancer Institute


The post Reprogramming Neutrophils to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/reprogramming-neutrophils-to-enhance-cancer-immunotherapy-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=reprogramming-neutrophils-to-enhance-cancer-immunotherapy-2

Tuesday, April 18, 2023

Tertiary Lymphoid Structures, An Indicator of Anti-Cancer Immune Response

Tertiary Lymphoid Structures, An Indicator of Anti-Cancer Immune Response





Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are organized collections of immune cells that resemble lymph nodes and form outside lymphoid organs, often in areas of inflammation, infection, or cancer. TLSs are thought to play an essential role in the anti-tumor immune response. They can promote immune cells’ activation and expansion, including T and B cells, in the tumor microenvironment. I would compare these with a military base, where the immune cells can hang out and get prepared to attack cancer, staying close to the tumor itself. This again supports that much of the action of the immune response is at or around the tumor, so treating directly with intratumoral immunotherapy gets you right into the heart of the action.

TLSs have been associated with improved outcomes in various cancers, including melanoma, breast and lung cancer. In addition, some studies have suggested that TLSs in the tumor microenvironment may predict response to immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapies that target immune checkpoints, such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, have been shown to promote the formation of TLSs in some cancer patients. In addition, some studies have suggested that other cancer treatments, especially PEF (Pulsed Electrical Field), may also promote the formation of TLSs in the tumor microenvironment.

Research is ongoing to understand better the role of TLSs in the anti-tumor immune response and to develop new strategies to target and enhance their formation in cancer patients. NanoString, which I have discussed before, can be used to identify and characterize these TLS. If successful, these strategies may provide a new approach to cancer immunotherapy that targets the formation of TLSs to promote anti-tumor immunity.
References:


The post Tertiary Lymphoid Structures, An Indicator of Anti-Cancer Immune Response appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/tertiary-lymphoid-structures-an-indicator-of-anti-cancer-immune-response/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=tertiary-lymphoid-structures-an-indicator-of-anti-cancer-immune-response

Monday, April 17, 2023

NanoString, Powerful Cancer Immune Profiling That Can Determine Immune Targets Guiding Precision Medicine

NanoString, Powerful Cancer Immune Profiling That Can Determine Immune Targets Guiding Precision Medicine





What if it was possible to analyze all the potential immune checkpoints, costimulatory molecules, and cellular aspects to guide the treatment of immunotherapy? NanoString, a DNA barcode-based immune profiler, has this capability. The data it provides is far ahead of what standard immunotherapies are typically available. However, this technology, as a research tool, can direct treatment options. This is for resaerch, so it is not used in standard patients. It is unlikely that patients would have this done unless they are in a research protocol. It has helped guide treatment, especially when you run into resistant cancers. We have seen several patterns in cancers that we treated. One is LAG3, an immune checkpoint that can inhibit an anti-cancer immune response. With the NanoString analysis that we performed, in many cases when tumors were pressured with PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, we would see a subsequent upregulation of LAG-3, which may play a role in suppressing the anti-cancer immune response. Of course, a LAG-3 inhibitor, Opdualag, is now available, with approval just over a year ago.
Another example is that in many cases, we also identified upregulation of B7H3, another critical checkpoint shutting down the immune response. These are just a few of the actionable changes in the immune profile of the cancer that we have identified with NanoString. Like the CIA, NanoString gives you all the intelligence you need to fight your enemy, in this case, cancer. Though it is currently limited for research, it should be an available analysis for all patients in the future, guiding the “precision” immunotherapy treatment of cancer.
NanoString’s immune profiling assays enable researchers to analyze the immune microenvironment of cancer samples comprehensively. The assays use the nCounter Analysis System to simultaneously measure the expression of hundreds of genes associated with immune cell types, checkpoints, and other immune-related pathways.

The PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel includes probes for 770 genes across 20 immune pathways and enables the analysis of the tumor-immune microenvironment in a wide range of cancer types. The panel provides a comprehensive view of the immune cell types and immune-related pathways involved in the tumor microenvironment, including the presence and activity of immune cells, expression of immune checkpoint genes, and other critical immune-related genes.

In addition, NanoString offers a range of other immune profiling assays, including the Tumor Inflammation Signature (TIS) Panel, which measures the expression of 18 genes that are associated with immune cytolytic activity, and the myeloid panel, which measures the expression of genes related to myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor-associated macrophages.

Overall, NanoString’s immune profiling assays offer a powerful tool for researchers studying the immune microenvironment of cancer and have the potential to improve our understanding of the immune response to cancer and to guide the development of more effective immunotherapies.
The Williams Cancer Foundation has purchased a new NanoString with NCounter and GeoMx, bringing patients the most advanced treatment options.
Jason R. Williams, MD, DABR
Chief of Interventional Immuno Oncology
Williams Cancer Institute
Author of: “The Immunotherapy Revolution”
References:


The post NanoString, Powerful Cancer Immune Profiling That Can Determine Immune Targets Guiding Precision Medicine appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/nanostring-powerful-cancer-immune-profiling-that-can-determine-immune-targets-guiding-precision-medicine/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nanostring-powerful-cancer-immune-profiling-that-can-determine-immune-targets-guiding-precision-medicine

Friday, April 14, 2023

IMMUNOTHERAPY STUDIES THAT COULD CHANGE CONVENTIONAL CANCER TREATMENTS

IMMUNOTHERAPY STUDIES THAT COULD CHANGE CONVENTIONAL CANCER TREATMENTS





Some studies have shown that immunotherapy can cure locally advanced cancers in a period of between 1 and 6 months in the best cases. These cancers are characterized by having tumors that generally remain limited to the original site but can also spread to nearby lymph nodes. The patients who participated in the study had specific genetic changes that made them good candidates for immunotherapy. These genetic changes are called high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

In the study, half of the population received the immunotherapy drugs pembrolizumab and Keytruda for a period of 6 months. After immunotherapy treatment, these patients underwent surgery to remove any remaining tumor tissue. In half of these patients, no trace of the tumor that previously existed was found, which is known as a complete pathological response. The other patients received treatment with pembrolizumab alone for a period of 1 year, and only 1 out of 18 patients had an improvement in tumor size. Overall, immunotherapy shows an improvement compared to conventional treatments. For some people with these cancers in earlier stages, the complete treatment could be just a short course of immunotherapy.

The one key is that these patients have damaged or mutated DNA repair genes. This is relatively rare, but it gives a key insight that can be applied to all patients. Medications can be used to block the DNA repair, making even typical patients responsive to immunotherapy.

Currently, immunotherapy is a standard treatment used by oncologists to treat an increasing number of cancer types. The role of immunotherapy in treatment has evolved to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and eradicate cancer from their lives.



The post IMMUNOTHERAPY STUDIES THAT COULD CHANGE CONVENTIONAL CANCER TREATMENTS appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/immunotherapy-studies-that-could-change-conventional-cancer-treatments/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=immunotherapy-studies-that-could-change-conventional-cancer-treatments

Thursday, April 13, 2023

CXCR1/2 Inhibitors and MDSC, A Promising Future Immunotherapy Target

CXCR1/2 Inhibitors and MDSC, A Promising Future Immunotherapy Target





CXCR1/2 inhibitors have been shown to target myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which are immune cells that suppress the anti-tumor immune response and promote tumor growth. CXCR1/2 is involved in the recruitment of MDSCs to the tumor microenvironment, and inhibiting CXCR1/2 can prevent the recruitment of MDSCs, potentially enhancing the anti-tumor immune response.

Preclinical studies have shown that CXCR1/2 inhibitors can reduce the number of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment and enhance the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy in animal models. For example, combining a CXCR1/2 inhibitor with an immune checkpoint inhibitor has been shown to reduce the number of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment and enhance anti-tumor immunity in preclinical models of melanoma.

Several clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CXCR1/2 inhibitors, including SX-682, in cancer patients. The goal of these trials is to determine whether targeting CXCR1/2 can reduce the number of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment and enhance the anti-tumor immune response. If successful, CXCR1/2 inhibitors could provide a new treatment option for cancer patients who do not respond to existing immunotherapies.



The post CXCR1/2 Inhibitors and MDSC, A Promising Future Immunotherapy Target appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/cxcr1-2-inhibitors-and-mdsc-a-promising-future-immunotherapy-target/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cxcr1-2-inhibitors-and-mdsc-a-promising-future-immunotherapy-target

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF)

[/ av_imagen]

El
campo eléctrico pulsado (PEF, por sus siglas en inglés) es una técnica prometedora para el tratamiento del cáncer que utiliza pulsos cortos de electricidad de alto voltaje para atacar selectivamente las células cancerosas mientras deja

células sanas ilesas. Se ha demostrado que el PEF es eficaz en una serie de estudios preclínicos y actualmente se está estudiando en ensayos clínicos para el tratamiento de varios tipos de cáncer.
Durante el tratamiento con PEF, se colocan electrodos en la superficie de la piel o se insertan en el tumor. Luego se envían pulsos cortos de electricidad de alto voltaje al tumor, lo que crea un campo eléctrico que hace que se formen poros en las membranas celulares de las células cancerosas.
Estos poros rompen la membrana celular, lo que lleva a la muerte celular.
Una ventaja del PEF sobre los tratamientos tradicionales contra el cáncer, como la quimioterapia y la radioterapia, es que no es invasivo y no causa el mismo nivel de efectos secundarios. Se ha demostrado que el PEF es bien tolerado en ensayos clínicos, con pocos efectos adversos informados.
El PEF también es muy selectivo y se dirige a las células cancerosas sin dañar las células sanas.
Esto significa que el PEF tiene el potencial de usarse en combinación con otros tratamientos contra el cáncer, como la quimioterapia y la radioterapia, para mejorar su eficacia y reducir los efectos secundarios.
Si bien el PEF muestra una gran promesa como tratamiento contra el cáncer, se necesita más investigación para comprender completamente sus posibles aplicaciones y optimizar su uso. Los ensayos clínicos están actualmente
en marcha para evaluar la seguridad y eficacia del PEF en el tratamiento de varios tipos de cáncer.

The post Pulsed Electrical Field (PEF) appeared first on Williams Cancer Institute.



source https://williamscancerinstitute.com/pulsed-electrical-field-pef/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pulsed-electrical-field-pef